Skip to content
Alix Earle super bowl commercial are influencers dying out - Dig & Dig
Influencer Marketing

Are influencers dying out? Not quite, but your strategy might be

Maria Niderman-Ash - Dig & Dig

Maria Niderman-Ash

For years, influencer marketing has been hailed as one of the most powerful tools in a brand’s marketing arsenal. But lately, there’s been a growing narrative that the influencer bubble is bursting, which has left brands scratching their heads and asking themselves: are influencers dying out?

It’s an understandable concern. Engagement rates are becoming harder to maintain, audiences are more skeptical of paid partnerships, and consumers are tired of seeing creators promote products they clearly don’t use. An article even recently came out about a shop in Nantucket, Massachusetts, banning influencers from their premises!

But despite the headlines, influencers aren’t disappearing.  In fact, when brands ask “are influencers dying out?”, what they’re often seeing is a change in consumer behavior rather than a decline in influence itself: how influence works, how consumers respond to sponsored content, and what brands need to do to achieve results.

For brands wondering whether influencer marketing is still effective, the answer is yes. But the approach that worked five years ago won’t necessarily work today.

Audiences want real people, not perfect feeds

Influencer culture has changed dramatically. The highly curated, picture-perfect feeds that once dominated social media are losing their power as audiences increasingly seek relatability and transparency. Polished perfection is out, and authentic community is in.

Consumers today are more likely to trust an influencer who feels like a real person than someone who feels like a walking billboard. They want honest opinions, genuine recommendations and content that fits naturally into the creator’s world.

This doesn’t mean influencers have lost their influence. Quite the opposite. It’s just that the definition of influence has changed, and consumers have become more selective in who they trust.

Influence is no longer simply about follower count. It’s about credibility, community and the ability to drive action. A creator with 20,000 highly engaged followers who genuinely trust their recommendations and opinions can have a far greater impact than a celebrity with two million passive followers who can, on paper, get 10x the impressions and reach.

Which influencers are dying and which are winning?

If you’re wondering “are influencers dying out?”, it’s worth looking at which creators are actually struggling. In reality, it’s often the influencers relying on outdated tactics who are finding it hardest to find their feet: excessive sponsored content, generic product placements and partnerships that feel disconnected from who they are.

Audiences can spot an inauthentic collaboration from a mile away, and when every other post suddenly becomes sponsored content, you start to lose the community that built you up in the first place.

The creators continuing to grow are often those with a strong niche, a clear personality and a genuine connection with their audience. Whether it’s fitness, beauty, travel, fashion or parenting, people follow them because they offer expertise, entertainment or perspective, not because they’re constantly selling.

This is also why niche and micro-influencers continue to perform so well for many brands.

What is a micro-influencer?

Micro-influencers often have smaller audiences (between 10,000-100,000 followers), but their communities tend to be more engaged and closely connected. Their recommendations can feel more like advice from a trusted friend than a traditional advert.

That said, this doesn’t mean macro influencers are irrelevant. The right macro or mega influencer can still deliver incredible reach, cultural relevance and brand awareness. The question is whether that reach translates into the outcome a brand actually needs.

Micro vs. macro: it’s not one or the other

The debate around micro versus macro influencers often misses an important point: they serve different purposes. The best influencer strategies aren’t necessarily choosing one over the other, but instead they’re choosing the right creator for the right objective.

A mega influencer may be ideal for launching a product and generating mass awareness.

Take Kylie Jenner’s partnership with Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses launch. Whether consumers rushed out to buy the product because Kylie recommended it is almost beside the point. Her involvement generated huge awareness, sparked discussion across social media and helped the launch dominate online conversations.

That’s the power of a macro influencer: reach, visibility and cultural relevance.

Kylie Jenner meta glases collaboration - Dig & Dig

Micro-influencers tend to achieve something different.

Beauty brand Glossier built much of its success by turning loyal customers into advocates through its Rep program. Rather than relying solely on celebrity endorsements, the brand empowered everyday creators who already loved the products to share them with their own communities.

The result was a vast network of trusted recommendations that helped fuel the brand’s growth and community-led reputation.

Glossier affiliate program criteria - Dig & Dig

Neither approach is inherently better.

A macro influencer can put your brand in front of millions overnight. A network of micro-influencers can create trust, conversation and consideration among the people most likely to buy from you. The most effective influencer marketing campaigns often combine both.

Authenticity isn’t a nice-to-have

Authenticity has become one of the most overused words in influencer marketing, but it remains one of the most important.

The most effective influencer partnerships don’t start with, “How many followers does this person have?” They start with, “Does this person truly make sense for our brand?”

When a fitness creator partners with a sports nutrition brand they genuinely use, audiences are far more receptive than when that same creator suddenly promotes a completely unrelated product for a pay cheque.

Brands sometimes undermine campaigns by over-controlling them. Detailed scripts, rigid talking points and excessive approval processes can make content feel more like an advert than a recommendation.

The reality is that creators understand their audiences better than anyone else. The brands seeing the strongest results are often those willing to provide clear guidance while still allowing creators to communicate in their own voice.

Makeup brand REFY, which recently launched a new influencer campaign to promote their skin tint, did something most brands would never dream of doing… They dropped the traditional content approval process.

@itsbabykelz @REFY told me to give my brutally HONEST opinion on their new skin tint so….. here it is 👀 #makeupreview #makeuptips #makeupchallenge #makeuptutorial #refypartner ♬ original sound – kelly

Instead of scripting creators or reviewing footage beforehand as you would traditionally expect, REFY gave their influencers total freedom to say what they want about the product. There were no pre-post reviews or approvals, and everyone was paid for their honest feedback, whether good or bad.

By letting influencers speak freely and openly about the product, it created absolute trust with their communities, who appreciated the transparent, unfiltered opinions. No surprise here, but the high-risk strategy paid off as product reviews started to generate massive organic buzz and drove product sales +200% above forecast.

Alix Earle super bowl commercial are influencers dying out - Dig & Dig

Brands also need to give creators enough freedom to be themselves. Overly scripted briefs and rigid messaging can strip away the very thing that makes influencer marketing effective in the first place: the creator’s unique voice.

Maria Niderman-Ash, Social & Influencer Manager

Are mega influencers worth the investment?

Sometimes. But not always.

The biggest mistake brands can make is treating influencer marketing like a simple media buy. Paying more for a larger following doesn’t automatically mean you’ll get a better return.

ROI needs to be measured against the campaign objective. Is the goal awareness, engagement, traffic, conversions, content creation or long-term brand equity?

A mega influencer might generate millions of impressions, but a network of smaller creators could deliver stronger engagement and conversion at a fraction of the cost.

Think a brand dinner or event where dozens of micro-influencers are invited, rather than just one multi-million influencer. Equally, one culturally relevant celebrity partnership can create an outsized impact that smaller creators simply can’t replicate, for example, Sabrina Carpenter’s highly successful collab with Dunkin’ during her “Espresso-era”.

Sabrina Carpenter & Dunki' collaboration - Dig & Dig

The answer isn’t to abandon mega influencers and celebs, but it’s time to stop assuming that bigger automatically means better.

Where is the influencer industry heading?

When brands ask, “Are influencers dying out?”, they’re often really asking whether influencer marketing still has a future.

The answer is absolutely yes, but in my opinion, we’re heading towards a more sophisticated and fragmented influencer landscape.

The era of the “one influencer, one post” campaign is fading. In its place, we’ll see more long-term creator partnerships, creator-led brand building and campaigns designed around communities rather than follower counts.

We’ll also see brands become much more data-driven, using performance insights to understand not just who is generating reach, but who is actually influencing behavior.

And perhaps most importantly, the line between influencer and creator will continue to blur. The creators who thrive won’t necessarily be the ones with the biggest audiences, but they will be the ones who understand their communities, create consistently great content and maintain the trust that made them influential in the first place.

So, are influencers dying out? The short answer is no. But if your influencer strategy still starts and ends with follower count, it might be time to rethink it.

More from us

At Dig & Dig, as an influencer marketing agency, we help brands build influencer strategies designed for this new era of discovery. From identifying creators who genuinely align with your audience to developing campaigns that generate valuable content, conversations and long-term visibility, our approach goes beyond chasing reach for the sake of it.

As search behavior continues to shift towards social platforms, creator content and AI-generated recommendations, brands need influencer activity that works harder than a single post or campaign. We focus on building creator ecosystems that strengthen your visibility across the places audiences are actually discovering brands today.

Because if this article proves anything, it’s that influencers aren’t dying out. They’re becoming a bigger part of how consumers search, discover and decide.

If you’re looking to build an influencer strategy that’s fit for a world of AI-first search and modern discovery, get in touch or email contact@diganddig.com to speak with our team.

About the author

Expertly led, expertly done. Our approach goes deep, and so does our experience.

Maria Niderman-Ash - Dig & Dig

Maria Niderman-Ash

Social & Influencer Manager

Maria is a Social Media and Influencer Manager with over 10 years of experience shaping digital-first brand storytelling across fashion, travel, lifestyle, and culture. Known for blending strategic thinking with a strong creative instinct, she specializes in influencer partnerships, creator relations, social growth, and culturally relevant campaigns that actually connect with audiences, not just algorithms.

This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By using Dig & Dig, you accept our use of cookies.